Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jacey Radel Board President
Amanda Carter Board President
Lacey Shinew Treasurer
April Jendrasiak Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicolle DiCenso Board President
Emily Greene Treasurer
Elizabeth Holmberg Board Member
Dionie Parrish Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOBIAS MOLESKI Board President
JUNIE PARRISH Board President
EMILY GREENE TREASURE
NICOLLE DICENSO Secretary
ELIZABETH HOLMBERG Board Member
ELIZABETH HOLMBERG Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in MI for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.