Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 9.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 15.0% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 21.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 14.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 5.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 10.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 12.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 31.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 32.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 21.4% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 33.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 43.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 — — 23.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WHIT WHITAKER Executive Director 11.8% of Rev
CHRISTIAN ADAIR Board President —
CAROLYN DUNN Secretary —
WALLACE BARBER Treasurer —
FRANK WALKER Board President —
JAMES BROWN Board Member —
SUZANNE LEIBEE Board Member —
LLOYD ALVERSON Board Member —
SEON JACKSON Board Member —
PAULA CAMPBELL-RUDD Board Member —
PAT TATUM Board Member —
CHRIS FORD Board Member —
GEORGE BROWN Board Member —
OBIE TAYLOR Board Member —
TIFFANY DANIELS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERVY WHITAKER II Executive Director 10.7% of Rev
JAMES BROWN Board Member —
LATARIKA YOUNG Secretary —
PAT TATUM Treasurer —
SEON JACKSON Board Member —
GLENDA HUMPHREY GEORGE Board Member —
GEORGE BROWN Board Member —
WALLACE BARBER Board Member —
SHULING FISTER Board Member —
CAROLYN DUNN Board Member —
CHRISTIAN ADAIR Board President —
FRANK WALKER Board President —
DR DAN SHEEHAN Board Member —
PERCY THOMAS Board Member —
PAUL CAMPBELL-RUDD Board Member —
TIFFANY DANIELS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONALD MASON Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
JAMES BROWN Board Member —
LATARIKA YOUNG Secretary —
OLIVIA DAVIS Treasurer —
SEON JACKSON Board Member —
GLENDA HUMPHREY GEORGE Board Member —
GEORGE BROWN Board Member —
WALLACE BARBER Board Member —
SHULING FISTER Board Member —
PAT TATUM Board Member —
CAROLYN DUNN Board Member —
CHRISTIAN ADAIR Board President —
FRANK WALKER Board President —
DR DAN SHEEHAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 32 → 54 over 5 years (improving by 22 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.