Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 24.6% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIM DUPUIS | Board Member | 16.2% of Rev | ||
| KIM DUPUIS | Board Member | 13.5% of Rev | ||
| MARK DIPIETRO | Board President | — | ||
| DAMIEN LICATA | Board President | — | ||
| MARLA STEFFLRE | Treasurer | — | ||
| CATHERINE BEHRENS | Secretary | — | ||
| JONATHON AUSTIN | Board Member | — | ||
| MARK DIPIETRO | Board President | — | ||
| DAMIEN LICATA | Board President | — | ||
| CATHERINE BEHRENS | Secretary | — | ||
| JONATHAN AUSTIN | Board Member | — | ||
| MAKENZIE YELIN | Board Member | — | ||
| MARLA STEFFLRE | Treasurer | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 64 other orgs in NH with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (40 vs. 66).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Overall score has gone from 32 → 41 over 2 years (improving by 9 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.