Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 51 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 23.9% | 50 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 43 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2010 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2009 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Strycharz | Artistic Director | 18.0% of Rev | ||
| Clare Bertrand | Secretary | — | ||
| Keith Black | Board Member | — | ||
| Paul Stallman | Board President | — | ||
| Pam Plumer | Board President | — | ||
| Stephanie Joyce | Board Member | — | ||
| Sarah Maloney-Yee | Board Member | — | ||
| Sharon Carlson | Treasurer | — | ||
| Molly Millay | Board Member | — | ||
| Susan Niles | Board Member | — | ||
| Jennifer Champagne | Board Member | — | ||
| Dawna Holmes | Board Member | — | ||
| Julie O'Leary | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points above the peer median (75 vs. 42).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 51 → 51 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.