Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 38 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 4.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT HOLLIS Board President —
LISA SANTOS Treasurer —
DONNA HOLLIS Secretary —
JOHN F SOUZA Board Member —
LLOYD ROSENBERG Board Member —
GARY SJOLIN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LLOYD ROSENBERG Board Member 0.9% of Rev
ROBERT HOLLIS Board President —
LISA SANTOS Treasurer —
DONNA HOLLIS Secretary —
JOHN F SOUZA Board Member —
GARY SJOLIN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT HOLLIS Board President —
LISA SANTOS Treasurer —
DENISE FAHERTY Board Member —
DONNA HOLLIS Secretary —
JAKE HILL Board Member —
RENEE NARDO Board Member —
JOHN F SOUZA Board Member —
LLOYD ROSENBERG Board Member —
GARY SJOLIN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points below the peer median (15 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 38 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.