Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RON ARDEN Artistic Director 31.3% of Rev
NATHAN GALE Treasurer
PETER DANOS Board President
JANE CURTIS Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRETT OSTERTAG Secretary
JOSHUA POUCHER Treasurer
NOAH MENDEZ Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA KYRIACOU Board President
ROBERT KENEHAN Board President
LAURIE WHISLER Secretary
JOSHUA POUCHER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 20 points above the peer median (55 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.