Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
65
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
70
Score

Governance Advisory

📋 Compliance Status

State Annual Report
Status: OVERDUE
Overdue: 192 days

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 65 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 Hidden 58 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 Hidden 62 Fragile Recovery
2019 Hidden 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 Hidden 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 Hidden 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 Hidden 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 Hidden 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 Hidden 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 Hidden 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 Hidden 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2010 Hidden 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
70 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
65 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 37 points above the peer median (70 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 62 → 65 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.