Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 20.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Valerie Walton Executive Director
Teresa Myers Treasurer
Patty Brayden Board Member
Tad Hitchcock Board Member
Andre Soloman SecyClerk
Mark Wartman Board President
Carol Smolenski Board Member
Jordan Potash Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Valerie Walton Executive Director 14.1% of Rev
Valerie Walton Executive Director 9.3% of Rev
Teresa Myers Treasurer 4.5% of Rev
Teresa Myers Treasurer 3.8% of Rev
Patty Brayden Board Member
Tad Hitchcock Board Member
Brianna Rowley Board Member
Mike Wartman Board Member
Patty Brayden Board Member
Tad Hitchcock Board Member
Brianna Rowley Board Member
Mark Wartman Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (65 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.