Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 13.5% 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 18.3% 35 Fragile Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 19.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 13.3% 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 11.7% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 13.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2016 17.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sean McInturff Board President
Katherine Price Treasurer
Sara Bechtold Secretary
Denise Fenner Executive Director
LaCretia Gelley Executive Director
Diane Dodd Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Denise Fenner Executive Director 12.8% of Rev
Diane Dodd Board Member 4.1% of Rev
Sean McInturff Board President
Heather Haugen Treasurer
Casey Bauer Board President
Elisa Gray Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Denise Fenner Executive Director 11.4% of Rev
Julie Hoffmeister Board President
Alex Zakroff Treasurer
Sean McInturff Board Member
Melanie Plourde Board Member
Jill Tucker Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.