Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 17.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 13.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 21.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 17.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 19.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 18.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 20.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 17.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 19.9% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2009 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA WALL Board Member
SUSAN BIGG Board President
BRIAN BOTSFORD Treasurer
TAMMY JACKSON VICE PRESIDE
LOIS THALKEN Board President
KIM ANDERSON Board Member
ELLERY BUTTERFIELD Board Member
SUSAN GIERHAN Board Member
MARILYN HADLEY Board Member
DARLA HEGGEM Board Member
BRYCE JENSEN Board Member
KAREN RHOADS Board Member
EMILY ROEMMICH Board Member
KYLE SAYLER Board Member
ROBERT SHAFFER Board Member
JULIE SPIERS Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY BARTLING Board Member
KATHY BOKENKAMP Board Member
MICHAEL DELORM Board Member
LORALEA FRANK Board Member
SUSAN GIERHAN Board Member
LAUREN HARBOLS Board Member
BOB HEIDEN Board Member
MATT JOHNSON Board Member
STEPHEN LEWIS Board Member
EMILY ROEMMICH Board Member
JULIE SPIERS Secretary
LOIS THALKEN Board Member
ANN BAUER VICE PRESIDE
BRIAN BOTSFORD Treasurer
GARY DAVIS Board President
LUIS OLIVAS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY BARTLING Board Member
KATHY BOKENKAMP Board Member
KIMBERLY DART Board Member
MICHAEL DELORM Board Member
LORALEA FRANK Board Member
LAUREN HARBOLS Board Member
BOB HEIDEN Board Member
MATT JOHNSON Board Member
STEPHEN LEWIS Board Member
VONDA LUNDELL Board Member
LEE ANN PURDY Board Member
JULIE SPIERS Board Member
LOIS THALKEN Board Member
ANN BAUER VICE PRESIDE
BRIAN BOTSFORD Treasurer
GARY DAVIS Board President
YVONNE DEYLE Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (0 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.