Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 10.7% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 39.3% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARA RECINE Executive Dir. 27.7% of Rev
TRICIA BURNS Board Member
JEFF KEASLER-BIRD Board Member
BRANDYN MCGHEE Board Member
P MICHAEL KIMMEL Board Member
NATHAN COLOMBO Board Member
PETER GREGORY Board Member
TIA ARTHUR Board Member
ARMEN ASATURIAN Board President
JUSTIN WALKER Treasurer
THOM MITCHELL Secretary
BILL ROBBINS Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARA RECINE Executive Dir. 25.7% of Rev
ARMEN ASATURIAN Board President
JUSTIN WALKER Treasurer
THOM MITCHELL Secretary
SUSAN MCLERNON Board Member
PAULA HANSEN Board Member
BRANDYN MCGHEE Board Member
P MICHAEL KIMMEL Board Member
NATHAN COLOMBO Board Member
PETER GREGORY Board Member
BILL ROBBINS Board President
ANTONIO SALAZAR Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points above the peer median (90 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 65 → 57 over 5 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.