Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 15.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 9.7% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 17.2% 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 12.1% 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 10.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 14.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 11.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 13.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 13.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 16.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 17.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 17.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kate Dumbleton Executive Director 14.6% of Rev
John Ellis Board President
Almarie Wagner Treasurer
Judith Stein Secretary
Cheryl Whitaker Board Member
Judge James B Zagel Board Member
Lauren Moltz Board Member
Paula Jones Board Member
Richard Stephenson Board Member
Robert Guttman Board Member
Shirley Massey Board Member
Susan Oppenheimer Board Member
Wendy Williams Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kate Dumbleton Executive Director 9.4% of Rev
Samuel Lewis Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
Lauren Moltz Board President
Judith Stein Secretary
Almarie Wagner Treasurer
John Ellis Board Member
Paula Jones Board Member
Susan Oppenheimer Board Member
Richard Stephenson Board Member
Cheryl Whitaker Board Member
Wendy Williams Board Member
Judge James B Zagel Board Member
Robert Guttman Board Member
Shirley Massey Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kate Dumbleton Executive Director 9.4% of Rev
Samuel Lewis Executive Director 1.9% of Rev
Lauren Moltz Board President
Judith Stein Secretary
Almarie Wagner Treasurer
John Ellis Board Member
Paula Jones Board Member
Susan Oppenheimer Board Member
Richard Stephenson Board Member
Cheryl Whitaker Board Member
Wendy Williams Board Member
Judge James B Zagel Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kate Dumbleton Executive Director 8.4% of Rev
Lauren Moltz Board President
Judith Stein Secretary
Almarie Wagner Treasurer
John Ellis Board Member
Paula Jones Board Member
Susan Oppenheimer Board Member
Richard Stephenson Board Member
Cheryl Whitaker Board Member
Wendy Williams Board Member
Judge James B Zagel Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (15 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.