Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 38 Fragile Recovery
2023 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 0.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JERYL JOHNSTON Board President
MELISSA WOZNIAK Treasurer
JAMIE KLENETSKY FAY Secretary
STANLEY V SMITH Board Member
ROBERT COYNE Board Member
JOHN BICKERTON Board Member
SARAH QUINN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FAHAD SIADAT Executive Director
MELISSA WOZNIAK Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA WOZNIAK Treasurer 0.3% of Rev
FAHAD SIADAT FACILITATOR 0.1% of Rev
REBECCA EHREN CHAIRWOMAN
JENNIFER WU Board Member
BRENDA MONTAGNA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 24 points below the peer median (5 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.