Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 1.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 1.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 1.6% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 3.4% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 3.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 2.9% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 2.3% 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 5.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 4.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 3.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 8.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 0.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT WEINER Executive Director 1.0% of Rev
LANFORD POTTS Board Member 0.4% of Rev
DANIEL GUYETTE Board President 0.1% of Rev
ALICE KEMERLING Board President
PATRICIA HUISKAMP Secretary
CHARLES OFSTEIN Treasurer
JULIE NEMITZ Board Member
SONYA HOLLINS Board Member
JACK HOPKINS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADAM S WEINER Executive Director 0.9% of Rev
ROBERT WEINER Executive Director 0.2% of Rev
LANFORD POTTS Board Member 0.2% of Rev
LANFORD POTTS Board Member 0.1% of Rev
DANIEL GUYETTE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
KATHY MULAY Board President 0.1% of Rev
JOSHUA T WEINER Board President
DANIEL GUYETTE Board Member
CHARLES OFSTEIN Board Member
BIANCA CIUNGAN WASHINGTON Board Member
JERROLD T FRENCH Board Member
PATRICIA HUISKAMP Board Member
ALICE KEMERLING Board Member
JULIE NEMITZ Board Member
ADAM S WEINER Executive Director
JOSHUA T WEINER Board President
KATHY MULAY Board President
CHARLES OFSTEIN Board Member
BIANCA CIUNGAN WASHINGTON Board Member
JERROLD T FRENCH Board Member
PATRICIA HUISKAMP Board Member
ALICE KEMERLING Board Member
JULIE NEMITZ Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADAM S WEINER Executive Director 1.2% of Rev
KATHY MULAY Board President 0.4% of Rev
LANFORD POTTS Board Member 0.2% of Rev
DANIEL GUYETTE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
JOSHUA T WEINER Board President
CHARLES OFSTEIN Board Member
BIANCA CIUNGAN WASHINGTON Board Member
JERROLD T FRENCH Board Member
PATRICIA HUISKAMP Board Member
ALICE KEMERLING Board Member
JULIE NEMITZ Board Member
MICHELE MARQUARDT Secretary
MELISSA HARTRIDGE Treasurer
PHILLIP LONG Board Member
MICHAEL MCDONALD Board Member
JANICE STIFLER Board Member
TERRY WILLIAMS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (0 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.