Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
64
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 64 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 53 Fragile Recovery
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jody Brege Board President
Jennifer Meyers Board President
Erin Polkowski Treasurer
Kelly Gates Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jody Brege Board President
Amy Cummings Board President
Erin Polkowski Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jody Brege Board President
Amy Cummings Board President
Erin Polkowski Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
64 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in NY for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.