Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 — — 12.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 12.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 14.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 20.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 13.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 16.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 12.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 12.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director —
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director —
JANE BRAY Board Member —
MICHAEL LEVY Board Member —
PAUL MCGOVERN Board Member —
NANCY MINQUEZ Board Member —
GRACE ATKINSON Board Member —
ASHTON SNIEDERMAN Board Member —
ELBERT WATSON Board President —
GENE HANSEN Board President —
APRIL WOODARD Board Member —
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director 6.3% of Rev
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director 6.3% of Rev
JANE BRAY Board Member —
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member —
MICHAEL LEVY Board Member —
PAUL MCGOVERN Board Member —
NANCY MINQUEZ Board Member —
LARA PHAM Board Member —
JAMES PRICE Board Member —
ASHTON SNIEDERMAN Board Member —
JENNIFER SWETS Board President —
DENISE WESSELER Board President —
APRIL WOODARD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
LORRAINE GRAVES BOARD ADVISO 0.0% of Rev
JANE BRAY Board Member —
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member —
MICHAEL LEVY BOARD ADVISO —
NANCY MINQUEZ BOARD ADVISO —
PETE MORFORD BOARD ADVISO —
NAOMI MUELLNER BOARD ADVISR —
LARA PHAM BOARD ADVISO —
JAMES PRICE BOARD ADVISO —
ASHTON SNIEDERMAN BOARD ADVISO —
JENNIFER SWETS Board President —
DENISE WESSELER Board President —
APRIL WOODARD BOARD ADVISO —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
GRACE ATKINSON Board Member —
JANE BRAY Board Member —
HARRY BROWN Board Member —
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member —
LORRAINE GRAVES BOARD ADVISO —
ANDREA HORNBUCKLE Board Member —
JENNIFER KODOLITSCH BVI GUILD RE —
HOPE PARYZEK Board Member —
PATRICIA SORRELL BOARD ADVISO —
ELBERT WATSON BOARD ADVISO —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 242 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points below the peer median (5 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.