Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
37
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 12.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 12.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 14.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 20.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 13.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 16.1% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 12.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 12.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director
JANE BRAY Board Member
MICHAEL LEVY Board Member
PAUL MCGOVERN Board Member
NANCY MINQUEZ Board Member
GRACE ATKINSON Board Member
ASHTON SNIEDERMAN Board Member
ELBERT WATSON Board President
GENE HANSEN Board President
APRIL WOODARD Board Member
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director 6.3% of Rev
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director 6.3% of Rev
JANE BRAY Board Member
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member
MICHAEL LEVY Board Member
PAUL MCGOVERN Board Member
NANCY MINQUEZ Board Member
LARA PHAM Board Member
JAMES PRICE Board Member
ASHTON SNIEDERMAN Board Member
JENNIFER SWETS Board President
DENISE WESSELER Board President
APRIL WOODARD Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director 6.1% of Rev
LORRAINE GRAVES BOARD ADVISO 0.0% of Rev
JANE BRAY Board Member
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member
MICHAEL LEVY BOARD ADVISO
NANCY MINQUEZ BOARD ADVISO
PETE MORFORD BOARD ADVISO
NAOMI MUELLNER BOARD ADVISR
LARA PHAM BOARD ADVISO
JAMES PRICE BOARD ADVISO
ASHTON SNIEDERMAN BOARD ADVISO
JENNIFER SWETS Board President
DENISE WESSELER Board President
APRIL WOODARD BOARD ADVISO

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUZANNE LOWNSBURY Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
JANINA MICHALSKI Artistic Director 5.2% of Rev
GRACE ATKINSON Board Member
JANE BRAY Board Member
HARRY BROWN Board Member
PATRICK FRANCIS Board Member
LORRAINE GRAVES BOARD ADVISO
ANDREA HORNBUCKLE Board Member
JENNIFER KODOLITSCH BVI GUILD RE
HOPE PARYZEK Board Member
PATRICIA SORRELL BOARD ADVISO
ELBERT WATSON BOARD ADVISO
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.