Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 52.3% | 53 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 38.3% | 58 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | 24.9% | 60 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAJESWARI PARITI | INSTRUCTOR | 66.0% of Rev | ||
| RAVIKUMAR V PARITI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAJESWARI PARITI | INSTRUCTOR | 58.3% of Rev | ||
| RAVIKUMAR V PARITI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAJESWARI PARITI | INSTRUCTOR | 50.9% of Rev | ||
| RAVIKUMAR V PARITI | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAJESWARI PARITI | INSTRUCTOR | 33.3% of Rev | ||
| RAVIKUMAR V PARITI | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 27 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points above the peer median (90 vs. 39).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.