Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
36
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 4.1% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES MICHAEL WILLIAMS Secretary 2.5% of Rev
YOOREE LOSORDO Executive Director 1.6% of Rev
Board Member
Board Member
BETH WIEMANN Board President
SUSAN WILSON Treasurer

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
NATHAN TROUP Board President
JAMESH MICHAEL WILLIAMS Secretary
ALIANA DE LA GUARDIA Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nathan Troup Board President
James Michael Williams Secretary
Aliana de la Guardia Treasurer
Dana Grider Board Member
Nathan Troup Board President
James Michael Williams Secretary
Aliana de la Guardia Treasurer
Dana Grider Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points below the peer median (15 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.