Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 35 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 39 Fragile Recovery
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VALERIE WEAVER Board President
WENDY FELLER Board President
TASHA PETERMEN Secretary
MATTHEW MILLER Treasurer
SHAILENDRA PENDSE Treasurer
WENDY FELLER Board President
TASHA PETERMEN Board President
MATTHEW MILLER Treasurer
SHAILENDRA PENDSE Treasurer
SUSAN BURNS Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM COLE Board President
TINA MANOLESCU Board President
MELISSA CZERPAK Secretary
MATTHEW MILLER Treasurer
SHAILENDRA PENDSE Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in PA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.