Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 56 Fragile Recovery
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 53 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 57 Fragile Recovery
2011 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tracey Corbitt Board President
Dan Nielsen Board President
Araina Eldridge Secretary
Rebecca Oppenheimer Treasurer
Martha Steuding Bilsback Board Member
Alexander Gasowski Board Member
Peter Horvath Board Member
Carl Korn Board Member
Brian Krzykowski Board Member
Kerri Travis Board Member
Duane Vaughn Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Terry DeArmas Board President
Jamie Thomas Board President
Ben Strader Secretary
Marsha King Purdue Board Member
Ausra Angermann Board Member
Meade Hutchins Board Member
Richard Goldstein Board Member
Lisa Schlachter Treasurer
Peter Horvath Board Member
Jack Reber Board Member
Dan Nielsen Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points above the peer median (65 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 53 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.