Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 42 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Snow | Board Member | — | ||
| Rose Mary Schmidt | Board President | — | ||
| Jocelyn Vick | Board President | — | ||
| Joyce Moldovan | Vol.Coord.\Dir. | — | ||
| Nadine Yenni | Treasurer | — | ||
| David Bolling | Board Member | — | ||
| Conor Hagen | Board Member | — | ||
| Tanner Walle | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Snow | Board Member | — | ||
| Rose Mary Schmidt | Board President | — | ||
| Jocelyn Vick | Board President | — | ||
| Joyce Moldovan | Vol.Coord.\Dir. | — | ||
| Nadine Yenni | Treasurer | — | ||
| Tom Rouse | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 42 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.