Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 31.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 67.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 96.1% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 14.8% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Amy Eggleston Board Member 20.5% of Rev
Brenda Coley Business Manager 11.2% of Rev
Al Lilly Board President
Shauna Barravecchio Board President
Jill Sprague Secretary
John Nadelin Treasurer
Roger Dutcher Board Member
Terri Ross Board President
Micah Taylor Treasurer
Andrea Hoyt Board Member
Michelle Staley Board President
Glenn Johnson Concertmaster

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Benjamin Del Vecchio Board Member 25.0% of Rev
Amy Eggleston Board Member 12.2% of Rev
Brenda Coley Business Manager 9.6% of Rev
Al Lilly Board President
Shauna Barravecchio Board President
Jill Sprague Secretary
John Nadelin Treasurer
Roger Dutcher Board Member
Terri Ross Board President
Yvonne Cavallini Board Member
Scott Walton Treasurer
Andrea Hoyt Board Member
Michele Pitts Board Member
Brittney Dial Board President
Glenn Johnson Concertmaster

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Benjamin Del Vecchio Artistic Director 33.3% of Rev
Amy Eggleston Accompanist, Asst. Conductor 5.0% of Rev
Benjamin Abel Concertmaster 3.2% of Rev
Natalie Etter Board President 1.3% of Rev
Roger Dutcher Board Member
Jill Sprague Secretary
Chris Weaver Bookkeeper
John Nadelin Treasurer
Glenn Johnson Grant Coordinator
Terri Ross Board President
Al Lilly Board President
Sue Walton Marketing Coordinator
Scott Walton Community Representative
Holly Brown Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Benjamin Del Vecchio Artistic Director 4.8% of Rev
Angela Pulliam Concert Mistress 2.4% of Rev
Michael Morin Office Manager 0.9% of Rev
Amy Eggleston Accompanist, Asst. Conductor 0.8% of Rev
Joyce Del Vecchio Board President
Laurie Sweany Board President
Roger Dutcher Board Member
Jill Sprague Secretary
Denise Laverty Board Member
Natalie Etter Board President
Chris Weaver Bookkeeper
John Nadelin Treasurer
Robb Dure Board Member
Glenn Johnson Grant Coordinator
Terri Ross Board President
Lynn Saunders Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 18 points below the peer median (15 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~19 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.