Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
36
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 3.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — — 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER SINDYLA Board Member 1.8% of Rev
JOELLEN WOODRING Board Member 0.4% of Rev
AMY MCSWEENEY Board Member 0.4% of Rev
KIMBERLY MIHALIK Secretary 0.2% of Rev
MICHAEL CARAFFI Board President —
GEORGIA MUTILLO Board President —
KELI SCHIMELPFENIG MARKETING/MEDIA —
CHRIS PEER Board Member —
MARISSA NAWALANIEC Board Member —
DAN TOMON Board Member —
CORY BRYNER Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GEORGIA MUTILLO Board President —
AMY MCSWEENEY Board Member —
CHRIS PEER Board Member —
JENNIFER SINDYLA Board Member —
BRENTON COCHRAN Board Member —
DAN TOMON Board Member —
STEVEN DELUCA Board Member —
KIMBERLY MIHALIK Secretary —
MICHAEL CARAFFI Board President —
JOELLEN WOODRING Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN DELUCA Board Member —
MICHAEL LAROCHELLE Board Member —
BRENTON COCHRAN Board Member —
JENNIFER SINDYLA Board Member —
CHRIS PEER Board Member —
BRITTANY BIZUB Board Member —
DAN TOMON Board Member —
MICHAEL CARAFFI Board President —
GEORGIA MUTILLO Board President —
JOANNA TIMURA Treasurer —
KIMBERLY MIHALIK Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE DELUCA Board Member —
MICHAEL LAROCHELLE Board Member —
SHARON MLECIK Board Member —
JENNIFER SINDYLA Board Member —
KIMBERLY MIHALIK Board Member —
MICHAEL CARAFFI Board President —
GEORGIA MUTILLO Board President —
SARAH DURHAM Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAN TOMAN Board Member —
SARAH DURHAM Treasurer —
STEVE DELUCA Board Member —
MICAHEL LAROCHELLE Board Member —
SHARON MLECIK Board Member —
MICHAEL CARAFFI Board President —
GEORGIA MUTILLO Board President —
KATIE FLANIGAN Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 329 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points below the peer median (15 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.