Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Neill Sachdev Board President
James Burke Treasurer
Kristin Triff Secretary
Mayela Aguirre Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Neill Sachtev Board President
Albert Boehm Treasurer
Ed Richters Secretary
Andre Rochester Chairman Of Curatorial Committee
Trea Brooks Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 17 other orgs in CT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (65 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.