Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — — 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 9.1% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 7.0% 40 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 10.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CATHERINE CARR KELLY Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
LEE MIKESKA GARDNER Artistic Director 3.7% of Rev
BETSY BARD Board Member —
ELIZABETH BALDWIN Board Member —
BRIAN CORR Board Member —
MITALENE FLETCHER Board Member —
BETSY GROBAN Board Member —
JOE LEVINE Board Member —
JANE MINASIAN Board Member —
CAROLYN MUGAR Board Member —
MELANIE WALLACE Board Member —
LAURA ROBERTS Board President —
KIMBERLY HOLLIDAY Board President —
ROSS KRINSKY Treasurer —
MARY DILL Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Catherine Carr Kelly Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
Debra Wise Board Member 2.9% of Rev
Lee Mikeska Gardner Board Member 2.8% of Rev
Laura Roberts Board President —
Betsy Groban Board President —
Allison Coleman Treasurer —
Mary Dill Secretary —
Betsy Bard Board Member —
Jane Minasian Board Member —
Carolyn Mugar Board Member —
Melanie Wallace Board Member —
Simar Singh Board Member —
Brian Corr Board Member —
Jeffrey Song Board Member —
Elizabeth Baldwin Board Member —
Jill Burrows Board Member —
Subrata Das Board Member —
Arlo Perez Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Catherine Carr Kelly Executive Director 3.6% of Rev
Lee Mikeska Gardner Board Member 3.1% of Rev
Debra Wise Board Member 2.8% of Rev
Laura Roberts Board President —
Betsy Groban Board President —
Allison Coleman Treasurer —
Mary Dill Secretary —
Betsy Bard Board Member —
Jane Minasian Board Member —
Carolyn Mugar Board Member —
Sally Adams Board Member —
Melanie Wallace Board Member —
Simar Singh Board Member —
Brian Corr Board Member —
Arlo Perez Board Member —
Jeffrey Song Board Member —
Elizabeth Baldwin Board Member —
Subatra Das Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Catherine Carr Kelly Board Member 3.9% of Rev
Lee Mikeska Gardner Board Member 3.2% of Rev
Debra Wise Board Member 3.2% of Rev
Betsy Bard Board Member 0.5% of Rev
Laura Roberts Board President —
Betsy Groban Board President —
Allison Coleman Treasurer —
Mary Dill Secretary —
Subrata Das Board Member —
Jane Minasian Board Member —
Carolyn Mugar Board Member —
Sally Adams Board Member —
Melanie Wallace Board Member —
Simar Singh Board Member —
Brian Corr Board Member —
Arlo Perez Board Member —
Jeffrey Song Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (0 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.