Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 60 Stable Stable Watch
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jeff Bonin Board President
Mike Wootton Treasurer
Erica Wilder Secretary
Jon King Board Member
Tim Mason Board Member
Jacques Livingston Board Member
Ben Everson Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jon King Board President
Mike Wootton Treasurer
Tim Mason Secretary
Jeff Bonin Board Member
Jacques Livingston Board Member
Erica Wilder Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jon King Board President
Mike Wootton Treasurer
Tim Mason Secretary
Tom Amodio Board Member
Jeff Bonin Board Member
Jen Stuckey Board Member
Blanca Rojas Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points above the peer median (65 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.