Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 22.8% 56 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Scott Lindroth Board President
Michael Bate Treasurer
Doug Henderson Board Member
Mathangi Kalyanasundaram Board Member
Eileen Chow Board Member
Tara Eppinger Board Member
Kim Hagan Board Member
Aaron Shackelford Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicholas DiEugenio Artistic Director 9.1% of Rev
Mimi Soloman Artistic Director 6.6% of Rev
Yoram Youngerman Board Member
Scott Lindroth Board President
Michael Bate Treasurer
Quentin Blanche Board Member
Doug Henderson Board Member
Mathangi Kalyanasundaram Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 145 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 38 points above the peer median (75 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.