Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 14.3% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 16.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 13.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 20.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 12.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 22.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 42.3% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 13.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 18.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 20.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 13.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 18.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDE MCNEAL Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
RONAN MARRA Board Member —
WANDA RIESZ Board Member —
NAPOLEON WILLIAMS Board Member —
ROBERT SKAFF Treasurer —
PATRICIA ALTAMIRANO Board Member —
CHARLES GILBERT Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDE MCNEAL Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
RONAN MARRA Board Member —
WANDA RIESZ Board Member —
NAPOLEON WILLIAMS Board Member —
ROBERT SKAFF Treasurer —
PATRICIA ALTAMIRANO Board Member —
CHARLES GILBERT Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDE MCNEAL Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
RONAN MARRA Board Member —
CHARLES GILBERT Board Member —
NAPOLEON WILLIAMS Board Member —
ROBERT SKAFF Treasurer —
JIM PHILLIPS Board Member —
ANDREW WEAVER Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDE MCNEAL Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
RONAN MARRA Board Member —
CHARLES GILBERT Board Member —
NAPOLEON WILLIAMS Board Member —
NATALY LOWDER Board Member —
ROBERT SKAFF Treasurer —
WANDA RIESZ Board Member —
JIM PHILLIPS Board Member —
ANDREW WEAVER Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDE MCNEAL Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
CLAUDIA BRAMAN Board Member 1.2% of Rev
RONAN MARRA Board Member —
CHARLES GILBERT Board Member —
NAPOLEON WILLIAMS Board Member —
NATALY LOWDER Board Member —
ROBERT SKAFF Treasurer —
WANDA RIESZ Board Member —
JIM PHILLIPS Board Member —
ANDREW WEAVER Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.