Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 17.5% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 17.6% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 12.4% 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 56 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY M SLEVIN CFA Board President
ANTOINETTE TUMA VICE PRESIDE
SHANE GASTECKI Treasurer
JANE VOROS Secretary
MELANIE M LASOTA Board Member
LAWRENCE D BRECK Board Member
JIM CUNNINGHAM Board Member
NATALIE TAAFFE HOFFMAN Board Member
KIMBERLY M JACKSON Board Member
MRS CAROLE KAMIN Board Member
ROBERT P KANTERS DIRECOTR
STEVEN SILBERMAN Board Member
RACHEL TABACHNICK Board Member
MONIQUE MEAD Board Member
JOSEPH LIU Board Member
TARA KOVACH Board Member
RICHARD MEYER Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY M SLEVIN CFA Board President
ANTOINETTE TUMA VICE PRESIDE
SHANE GASTECKI Treasurer
JANE VOROS Secretary
MELANIE M LASOTA Board Member
LAWRENCE D BRECK Board Member
JIM CUNNINGHAM Board Member
NATALIE TAAFFE HOFFMAN Board Member
KIMBERLY M JACKSON Board Member
MRS CAROLE KAMIN Board Member
ROBERT P KANTERS DIRECOTR
STEVEN SILBERMAN Board Member
RACHEL TABACHNICK Board Member
MONIQUE MEAD Board Member
JOSEPH LIU Board Member
TARA KOVACH Board Member
RICHARD MEYER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY M SLEVIN CFA Board President
ANTOINETTE TUMA VICE PRESIDE
SHANE GASTECKI Treasurer
SHANE GASTECKI Treasurer
JANE VOROS Secretary
MELANIE M LASOTA Board Member
LAWRENCE D BRECK Board Member
JIM CUNNINGHAM Board Member
NATALIE TAAFFE HOFFMAN Board Member
KIMBERLY M JACKSON Board Member
MRS CAROLE KAMIN Board Member
ROBERT P KANTERS DIRECOTR
STEVEN SILBERMAN Board Member
RACHEL TABACHNICK Board Member
MONIQUE MEAD Board Member
JOSEPH LIU Board Member
TARA KOVACH Board Member
RICHARD MEYER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRAIG JOHNSON RETIRED 7.6% of Rev
TIMOTHY M SLEVIN CFA Board President
ANTOINETTE TUMA VICE PRESIDE
SHANE GASTECKI Treasurer
JOANN VOSBURGH Secretary
MELANIE M LASOTA Board Member
LAWRENCE D BRECK Board Member
JIM CUNNINGHAM Board Member
NATALIE TAAFFE HOFFMAN Board Member
KIMBERLY M JACKSON Board Member
MRS CAROLE KAMIN Board Member
ROBERT P KANTERS DIRECOTR
STEVEN SILBERMAN Board Member
RACHEL TABACHNICK Board Member
JANE VOROS Board Member
MONIQUE MEAD Board Member
JOSEPH LIU Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.