Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 10.7% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 9.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 11.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 6.4% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 28.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 9.7% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 10.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.0% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 14.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 11.5% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — 11.5% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE DESEYN Executive Director 6.8% of Rev
KARLA BOOS Artistic Director 6.4% of Rev
KEN MCCRORY Treasurer —
ERICA SNYDER Board President —
ROBERT CUNNINGHAM Board Member —
JOSIAH GILLIAM Board Member —
SCOTT HARE Board Member —
LUKE A SIZEMORE Board President —
ANNA HOLLIS Board Member —
PATRICE MATAMOROS Board Member —
KATIE O'MALLEY Board Member —
SUSAN SMERD Board Member —
SUSAN SPEICHER Board Member —
BEATRIZ DE A ROCHA Board Member —
BREANNA TYSON Board Member —
LARRY WALSH Board Member —
WADE WILSON Board Member —
CAROLE KING Board Member —
SHELLY R PAGAC Secretary —
STEPHANY HARTSTIRN Board Member —
DANIEL WALDMANN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KARLA BOOS Artistic Director 4.8% of Rev
STEWART URIST Executive Director 4.1% of Rev
JACK BRICE Treasurer —
HELENE WEINRAUB Board Member —
TRACY MAHOOD Board Member —
CAROLE KING Board President —
SUSAN SMERD Board Member —
BRUCE CROCKER Board Member —
SUSAN SMITH Board Member —
MARK COX Board Member —
PHILIP FERLAND Board Member —
WAVERLY DUCK Board Member —
LUKE SIZEMORE Board Member —
ERICA SNYDER Board President —
SCOTT HARE Board Member —
ANNA HOLLIS Board Member —
PATRICE MATAMOROS Board Member —
SHELLY PAGAC Board Member —
HEATHER TERRELL Board Member —
STEPHANY HARTSIRN Board Member —
BEATRIX DE A ROCHA Board Member —
ERICK HOFFMAN Executive Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KARLA BOOS Artistic Director 5.0% of Rev
STEWART URIST Executive Director 4.8% of Rev
JACK BRICE Treasurer —
HELENE WEINRAUB Board Member —
TRACY MAHOOD Board Member —
CAROLE KING Board President —
SUSAN SMERD Board Member —
BRUCE CROCKER Board Member —
SUSAN SMITH Board Member —
MARK COX Board Member —
PHILIP FERLAND Board Member —
WAVERLY DUCK Board Member —
LUKE SIZEMORE Board Member —
ERICA SNYDER Board President —
SCOTT HARE Board Member —
ANNA HOLLIS Board Member —
PATRICE MATAMOROS Board Member —
SHELLY PAGAC Board Member —
HEATHER TERRELL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.