Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 12.1% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 7.5% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 20.2% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 18.7% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 13.7% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 18.0% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.0% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 18.2% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 9.5% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 3.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 8.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 6.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARA MAUPIN Executive Dir. 16.0% of Rev
AGATA CZOPEK Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
JOHN D LASKOWSKI Board Member
JUDY FASNACHT Board Member
JAMES NACE Treasurer
JOHN ULSH Board Member
PAM KEEFER Board Member
RAYMOND ENDERS Board Member
ERIN MARGERUM Board Member
DAVE KUTZ Board Member
TIM TRAVITZ Board Member
CHRIS RAMSEY Board President
TRUDY WITHERS Secretary
RICK CALLA Board Member
EDWARD BLACK Board President
MARILYN KAUFFMAN Board Member
STEPHEN SMITH Board Member
MARK HIPP Board President
CALVIN DUBROCK Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN P BOOTH Executive Dir. 22.3% of Rev
JOHN LASKOWSKI Board Member
MARYLIN KAUFFMAN Board Member
MARK HIPP Board President
BOB GOOD Board Member
PAM KEEFER Board Member
RAY ENDERS Board Member
ERIN MARGERUM Board Member
JAMES NACE Treasurer
BRAD FABER Board Member
CHRIS RAMSEY Board President
BRIAN HINKLE Board Member
TRUDY WITHERS Secretary
CALVIN DUBROCK Board Member
RICK CALLA Board Member
EDWARD BLACK Board President
STEPHEN SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN P BOOTH Executive Dir. 20.3% of Rev
JOHN LASKOWSKI Board Member
J BRUCE WALTER Secretary
MARYLIN KAUFFMAN Board President
MARK HIPP Board Member
GREG BILLOW Board Member
BOB GOOD Board Member
PAM KEEFER Board Member
RAY ENDERS Board Member
ERIN MARGERUM Board Member
JAMES NACE Treasurer
BRAD FABER Board President
CHRIS RAMSEY Board Member
BRIAN HINKLE Board Member
TRUDY WITHERS Board Member
CALVIN DUBROCK Board Member
RICK CALLA Board Member
ED BLACK Board President
STEPHEN SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN P BOOTH Executive Dir. 21.2% of Rev
JOHN LASKOWSKI Board Member
J BRUCE WALTER Secretary
MARYLIN KAUFFMAN Board President
MARK HIPP Board Member
R SCOTT SWARTZ Board President
BOB GOOD Board Member
GLENN HAFER Board Member
DAVID TROUTMAN Board Member
JAMES NACE Board Member
BRAD FABER Board President
CHRIS RAMSEY Board Member
BRIAN HINKLE Board Member
NATALIE FALATEK Treasurer
ED BLACK Board Member
TRISH FOULKROD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in PA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 38.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~33 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.