Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 13.2% 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 19.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 21.5% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 29.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 10.8% 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 11.8% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2010 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA SPITZER Executive Director 14.1% of Rev
HOLLY BAKER Board President —
BARBARA RANDALL Board President —
JOHN ELIA Secretary —
NATALIE LEHMAN Treasurer —
LIZ BUHRMAN Board Member —
SAMUEL SMITH Board Member —
BRIAN ZOELLER Board Member —
STEPHANIE WILSON Board Member —
TRISH MORRIS Board Member —
ERIKKA HECKMAN Board Member —
DANIELA DIGREGORIO Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA SPITZER Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
TARRYNE WEBB Executive Director 3.9% of Rev
ANNIKA DOWD Board President —
BARBARA RANDALL Board President —
DAWN BURGOON Secretary —
TAYLOR ROTE Treasurer —
WENDY ARISPE Board Member —
DOUG BOOZER Board Member —
JOHN ELIA Board Member —
LAURA SPONSELLER Board Member —
HOLLY STRAYER Board Member —
STEPHANIE WILSON Board Member —
BRIAN ZOELLER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TARRYNE WEBB EXECUTIVE DI 12.5% of Rev
WENDY ARISPE Board Member —
DOUG BOOZER Board Member —
DAWN BURGOON Secretary —
ANNIKA DOWD Board President —
JOHN ELIA Board Member —
BARBARA RANDALL VICE PRESIDE —
TAYLOR ROTE Treasurer —
LAURA SPONSELLER Board Member —
HOLLY STRAYER Board Member —
STEPHANIE WILSON Board Member —
BRIAN ZOELLER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL FISHER EXECUTIVE DI 6.5% of Rev
TARRYNE WEBB EXECUTIVE DI 6.5% of Rev
DAWN BURGOON Secretary —
DONALD BURKHOLDER Board Member —
BILL COY Board Member —
SHERREE DEVOR Board Member —
ANNIKA DOWD VICE PRESIDE —
MARISOL FELICIANO ASSISTANT TR —
MEGAN HEEBNER Treasurer —
MATTHEW MCBRIDE Board Member —
JEWEL PARKER Board Member —
SUZANNE PIPER Board Member —
JULIE RAULLI Board President —
TAYLOR ROTE Board Member —
JUDY SHOOP ASSISTANT SE —
BRIAN ZOELLER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 28 points below the peer median (50 vs. 78).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.