Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 7.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 7.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 10.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 10.1% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 11.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.3% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 7.3% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 10.1% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 57.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 8.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — 7.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 8.5% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — 8.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA SATAVA EXECUTIVE DI 8.6% of Rev
MARK ADDLEMAN BOARD PRESID —
LAURA ARGENBRIGHT Board Member —
KAREN AZER Board Member —
VICTORIA BECHTOLD-KUSH Board Member —
MICHAEL BODOLOSKY Board Member —
ALAN CASHAW Board Member —
STEPHANIE CAULDER Board Member —
LARRY M COCO Board Member —
JOHN P COYLE Board Member —
DIANNE FRYE DELISA Board Member —
BRADLEY HOLUTA BOARD SECRET —
LYNNE HOOD Board Member —
SAMAR R KHOUZAMI Board Member —
JOHN KLEIN BOARD TREASU —
WILLIAM J LOCHER Board Member —
MARK PASQUERILLA Board Member —
MARTIN E RADOVANIC Board Member —
J ERIC RENNER Board Member —
CRAIG SAYLOR Board Member —
JEFFREY STOPKO Board Member —
GREG SUPPES Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA SATAVA EXECUTIVE DI 7.1% of Rev
MARK ADDLEMAN BOARD PRESID —
KAREN AZER Board Member —
VICTORIA BECHTOLD-KUSH Board Member —
MICHAEL BODOLOSKY Board Member —
ALAN CASHAW Board Member —
STEPHANIE CAULDER Board Member —
LARRY M COCO Board Member —
JOHN P COYLE Board Member —
BRADLEY HOLUTA Board Member —
LYNNE HOOD Board Member —
JOHN KLEIN BOARD TREASU —
WILLIAM J LOCHER Board Member —
MARK PASQUERILLA Board Member —
MARTIN E RADOVANIC Board Member —
J ERIC RENNER Board Member —
CRAIG SAYLOR Board Member —
JEFFREY STOPKO Board Member —
GREG SUPPES Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA SATAVA EXECUTIVE DI 8.0% of Rev
PATRICIA HOFSCHER FORMER EXECU 1.0% of Rev
JOHN KLEIN Board Member —
WILLIAM J LOCHER BOARD PRESID —
MARTIN E RADOVANIC Board Member —
CRAIG SAYLOR Board Member —
ROB WERNER BOARD SECRET —
MARK ADDLEMAN Board Member —
KAREN AZER Board Member —
LARRY M COCO Board Member —
JOHN P COYLE PAST BOARD P —
MONICA M GARVER BOARD TREASU —
ROBERT HANSON Board Member —
BRADLEY HOLUTA Board Member —
LYNNE HOOD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 54 over 5 years (improving by 18 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.