Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 9.2% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 6.7% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 24.6% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 530.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 7.0% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 3.3% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 3.2% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 2.2% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 2.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 4.9% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 4.0% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 4.2% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANK BLASI Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
MICHAEL A BARBETTI EXECUTIVE COMMITTE
JOSEPH X GARVEY Treasurer
KIM D'ANDREA Board President
MARILYN VITALI Secretary
ATTY BRIAN CALI CHAIRMAN
JOHN KEARNEY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANK BLASI Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
MICHAEL A BARBETTI EXECUTIVE COMMITTE
SAM PRUDENTE Treasurer
KIM D'ANDREA Board President
MARILYN VITALI Secretary
ATTY BRIAN CALI CHAIRMAN
JOHN KEARNEY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 35 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.