Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
41
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 17.3% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 7.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 20.5% 45 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 18.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 8.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 6.2% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 8.8% 40 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 10.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 9.7% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 9.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 7.7% 40 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 9.1% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BIANA KOVIC Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
KIMBERLY MELLER Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
KENT HOFFMANN Secretary —
JOHN MCCLARY Board Member —
ANNE SMITH Board President —
CELESTE PAULI Board President —
DAVID HEIN Board Member —
DAMON WENIG Board Member —
MICHAEL BROOKS Board Member —
EVAN CHANCELLOR Board Member —
STEVEN FISCHER Board Member —
LAURA HERZOG Treasurer —
TRICIA MARTON Board Member —
PERRY PHILLIPS Board Member —
JULIE SEBRANEK Board Member —
DARREN OPEL Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA HERNDAY Board Member 15.9% of Rev
KEITH ABLER Board Member —
KRISTINE BERGAMO Board Member —
SCOTT KUEHN Board Member —
GINA COVELLI Board Member —
ROBERTA FILICKY-PENESKI Board Member —
JEFF MOHR Board Member —
KIMBERLYANNE MELLER Board Member —
DAREN OPEL Board Member —
ANN SMITH Board Member —
DAVID HEIN Board Member —
BILL JACOB Board Member —
KATHIE NORMAN Board President —
CELESTE PAULI Board President —
JOHN MCLARY Treasurer —
EMILY RENDALL-ARAUJO Secretary —
DAMON WENIG Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSHUA HERNDAY Board Member 15.6% of Rev
JOSHUA HERNDAY Board Member 13.0% of Rev
KEITH ABLER Board Member —
KRISTEN BERGAMO Board Member —
EUGENE CONGER Board Member —
GINA COVELLI Board Member —
ROBERTA FILICKY-PENESKI Board Member —
DAVID GALLIANETTI Board Member —
KIM MELLER Board Member —
JEFF MOHR Board Member —
DARREN OPEL Board Member —
EMILY RENDALL - ARAUJO Board Member —
ANNE SMITH Board Member —
STEVE STAUBER Board Member —
SCOTT KUEHN Board President —
KATHIE NORMAN Board President —
JOHN MCLARY Treasurer —
CELESTE PAULI Secretary —
KEITH ABLER Board Member —
KRISTEN BERGAMO Board Member —
EUGENE CONGER Board Member —
GINA COVELLI Board Member —
ROBERTA FILICKY-PENESKI Board Member —
DAVID GALLIANETTI Board Member —
KIM MELLER Board Member —
JEFF MOHR Board Member —
DARREN OPEL Board Member —
EMILY RENDALL - ARAUJO Board Member —
ANNE SMITH Board Member —
SCOTT KUEHN Board President —
KATHIE NORMAN Board President —
JOHN MCLARY Treasurer —
CELESTE PAULI Secretary —
DAVID HEIN Board Member —
BILL JACOB Board Member —
DAMON WENIG Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 20 points below the peer median (45 vs. 65).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.