Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.3% 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 12.0% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 13.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 0.9% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 12.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 11.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 13.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 15.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 13.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 17.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 14.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Benjamin Hickey Executive Director 13.9% of Rev
Laura O'Neill Board President —
Valerie Ingold Board President —
Morgan Tanski Treasurer —
Doug Levere Secretary —
Atina Fareed-Cooke Board Member —
Rachel Good Board Member —
Melissa Grainger Board Member —
Eric Kunsman Board Member —
Jordan Lema Board Member —
Douglas Levere Board Member —
Quincy Miracle Board Member —
Cristin L Murray Board Member —
Kim Sholly Board Member —
Brandon Watson Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VERONIQUE COTE Executive Director 16.1% of Rev
LUKE CUSACK Board President —
ERIN JORDAN Treasurer —
AITINA FAREED-COOKE Board Member —
VALERIE INGOLD Board Member —
DOUGLAS LEVERE Board Member —
AMBER RAMPINO Board Member —
MELISSA GRAINGER Board Member —
ERIC KUNSMAN Board Member —
KIM SHOLLY Board Member —
PARIS ROSELLI Secretary —
ERIC KUNSMAN Board Member —
JONELLE MARCHESE Board Member —
CRISTIN L MURRAY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAWRENCE BROSE Executive Director 11.8% of Rev
MELISSA GRAINGER Board Member 1.0% of Rev
AITINA FAREED-COOKE Board Member 0.3% of Rev
LUKE CUSACK Board President —
GRIFFIN JANKOWSKI Treasurer —
PARIS ROSELLI Secretary —
DR ROBERT J SCHULMAN Board Member —
STEVEN SIEGEL Board Member —
ANDREW P UCCI Board Member —
VALERIE INGOLD Board Member —
DOUGLAS LEVERE Board Member —
CRISTIN L MURRAY Board Member —
AMBER RAMPINO Board Member —
VERONIQUE COTE Executive Director —
BIFF HENRICH Board President —
LUKE CUSACK Board President —
GRIFFIN JANKOWSKI Treasurer —
PARIS ROSELLI Secretary —
ARIEL ABERG-RIGER Board Member —
GEORGE K ARTHUR Board Member —
DR ROBERT J SCHULMAN Board Member —
STEVEN SIEGEL Board Member —
ANDREW P UCCI Board Member —
AITINA FAREED-COOKE Board Member —
VALERIE INGOLD Board Member —
DOUGLAS LEVERE Board Member —
CRISTIN L MURRAY Board Member —
AMBER RAMPINO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 68 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (35 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.