Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 8.4% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 6.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 9.2% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 8.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 7.9% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 6.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 8.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 8.6% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 6.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 7.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 6.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK WAHLERT Executive Director 6.9% of Rev
KATE HENDEL Board Member
CHARLES BARLAND Board Member
TOM BOLDUC Board Member
NICOLE GANTZ Board Member
JOHN LINK Board President
DEBORAH LABEAU Board Member
KENT RENIER Board Member
MANTEA SCHMID Board Member
JACK WERTZBERGER Board Member
MATT BOLEYN Board Member
MEGAN GLOSS Secretary
WES HEITZMAN Board Member
PAULINE CHILTON Board Member
JOEL GEHLING Treasurer
JACQUIE ROTH Board Member
MARIANN WEBER Board Member
GREG REHMKE Board Member
LAURA CALHOUN Board Member
KEN MILLER Board Member
EVA SCHMID Board Member
JASON BENSON Board Member
POPPY CONLON Board Member
RICHELLE GENTILE Board Member
PATTI LACHECKI Board Member
YVONNE MALLORY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 86 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 50 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.