Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Beames Board President
Amy Roach Secretary
Mary Colone Secretary
Carrie Roberts Treasurer
John Jurgenssen Board President
Celeste Johns Board Member
Lynne Bolstad Board Member
Emma Kirsch Board Member
Jean Guida Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Susan Beames Board President
Amy Roach Secretary
Kenneth Schaaf Secretary
Elizabeth Malavet Treasurer
Sheila Ayres Board President
Celeste Johns Board Member
David Hayes Board Member
Robert Harder Board Member
Jay Goldman Board Member
Ted Brackett Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Chris Shields Board President
Conny Horne Secretary
David Jones Secretary
Cynthia Magee Treasurer
Marcia Bowne Board Member
Chris Karmosky Board President
Kirsten Green Board Member
Kenneth Schaaf Board Member
Robert Harder Board Member
Sheila Ayers Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 44 points above the peer median (75 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.