Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
58
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 59 Fragile Recovery
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 55 Fragile Recovery
2012 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alana Martinueau Board President
Henry Albin Board President
Whitley Campbell Treasurer
Mackenzie Cox-Miller Secretary
Susan Dresser Board Member
Melanie Thorpe Board Member
Stefan Topolski Board Member
Dominic Baird Board Member
Diana Herrara-Baird Board Member
Jesse Clark Board Member
Erika Clark Board Member
Justin Krawczyk Board Member
Lisa Portier Board Member
Barbara Krawczyk Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alana Martinueau Board President
Christina Cerbone Board President
Zachary Billings Treasurer
Brooke Martineau Secretary
Gerald Marcanio Board Member
Dominic Baird Board Member
Henry Albin Board Member
Dee Herrera Board Member
Carolyn Caron Board Member
Erika Clark Board Member
Rachel Cronen-Townsend Board Member
Susan Dresser Board Member
Leah Rantz Board Member
Thelma Moeckel Board Member
Melanie Thorpe Board Member
Chris Rose Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points above the peer median (90 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 58 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.