Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
58
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 58 Fragile Recovery
2023 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 59 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 59 Fragile Recovery
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carol Arrucci Board President
Ray Arrucci Board Member
Annie Tan Secretary
Brenda C Mileo Treasurer
Steve Rapillo Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carol Arrucci Board President
Ray Arrucci Board Member
Annie Tan Secretary
Brenda C Mileo Treasurer
Steve Rapillo Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (90 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.