Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.6% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 11.6% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 10.0% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 8.3% 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 9.1% 38 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 10.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 12.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 8.2% 38 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 12.1% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 11.7% 39 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 12.0% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 12.0% 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GREG HUGHES Executive Director 17.6% of Rev
LINDA KOZAK Board President —
MARY GRETHER Board President —
CARL AMRHEIN Treasurer —
BETHANY DEHAAN Secretary —
RAY ALLEN Board Member —
BRUCE HOREK Board Member —
JESSICA SARROS Board Member —
RICHARD STULTZ Board Member —
MARY WALTERS Board Member —
MARY ANNE GERSTNER Board Member —
JIM BUSHY Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA KOZAK Board President —
MARY GRETHER Board President —
CARL AMRHEIN Treasurer —
BETHANY DEHAAN Secretary —
RAY ALLEN Board Member —
BRUCE HOREK JOINED MARCH 2022 Board Member —
JESSICA SARROS JOINED MAY 2022 Board Member —
RICHARD STULTZ Board Member —
MARY WALTERS JOINED FEBRUARY 2022 Board Member —
MICHAEL SURRAT RESIGNED JANUARY 202 Board Member —
SALLY NUTINI RESIGNED JANUARY 2022 Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDA KOZAK Board President —
LORRAINE FREEMAN Board President —
CARL AMRHEIN Treasurer —
BETHANY DEHAAN Secretary —
RAY ALLEN Board Member —
MARY GRETHER Board Member —
SALLY NUTINI Board Member —
KEITH OLSON Board Member —
RICHARD STULTZ Board Member —
MICHAEL SURRATT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID J NOVOTNY Board President —
LORRAINE FREEMAN Board President —
CARL AMRHEIN Treasurer —
BETHANY DEHAAN Secretary —
RAY ALLEN Board Member —
MARY GRETHER Board Member —
LINDA KOZAK Board Member —
SALLY NUTINI Board Member —
KEITH OLSON Board Member —
MICHAEL SURRATT Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 22 points below the peer median (45 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.