Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 43 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 12.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 22.6% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.2% 37 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY GERLACH Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
MARCY MILLER Board Member
ROGER BENNETT Board President
JOHN POLLES Board President
VICKI BOWER Treasurer
MALATHI RAGHAVAN Board Member
CATHERINE SANDHAGE Board Member
CONNIE WORKMAN Board Member
WILLIAM MCINERNEY Board President
EMILY OHLAND Board Member
GAIL POLLES Board Member
SARA SHOOP Secretary
STEVE WIEN Board Member
GAIL BRICKLER Board Member
HILARY COOKE Board Member
BETH DANA Board Member
VINCENT GUIDO Board Member
SCOTT HINES Board Member
SALLIE JANOWIAK Board Member
SHEILA KLINKER Board Member
RONALD MAHRLING JR Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY GERLACH Executive Director 14.9% of Rev
GAIL BRICKLER Board Member
HILARY COOKE Board Member
BETH DANA Board Member
VINCENT GUIDO Board Member
SCOTT HINES Board Member
SALLIE JANOWIAK Board Member
SHEILA KLINKER Board Member
RONALD MAHRLING JR Board Member
MARCY MILLER Board Member
ROGER BENNETT Board President
JOHN POLLES Board President
VICKI BOWER Treasurer
MALATHI RAGHAVAN Board Member
CATHERINE SANDHAGE Board Member
CONNIE WORKMAN Board Member
WILLIAM MCINERNEY Board President
EMILY OHLAND Board Member
GAIL POLLES Board Member
SARA SHOOP Secretary
STEVE WIEN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DONNA PETERSON ASST ADMINIS 14.6% of Rev
MARCY MILLER Board President
ROGER BENNETT Board President
WILLIAM LAPCHESKA Board President
RICHARD LODDE Treasurer
EMILY ULRICH Secretary
DANIEL BERGER Board Member
GAIL BRICKLER Board Member
BETH DANA Board Member
TED FONDAK Board Member
DAWN HAYS Board Member
SALLIE JANOWIAK Board Member
SHEILA KLINKER Board Member
RONALD MAHRLING JR Board Member
WILLIAM MCINERNEY Board Member
PETER MECKL Board Member
EMILY OHLAND Board Member
GAIL POLLES Board Member
RACHEL RAVELLETTE Board Member
SARA SHOOP Board Member
STEVE WIEN Board Member
CINDY GERLACH Executive Director
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 5 points above the peer median (45 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.