Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 59 Fragile Recovery
2018 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 59 Fragile Recovery
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GUS SOLOMONS Board Member
JEAN YVES MINET Board Member
JUDITH RENLAY Board Member
KELLI COOK Board Member
WILLIAM PETRONI Board Member
SCOTT DEVERE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (90 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 59 → 55 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.