Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.3% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 14.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 41.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 43.3% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 8.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 10.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 13.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 17.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 9.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2013 14.7% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 17.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 11.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 19.0% of Rev
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 17.3% of Rev
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board President
ANDREW MCNAMARA Board President
THOMAS LENTZ Treasurer
VIKTORIA DAVIS Secretary
SARAH HOULE Board Member
MELINDA WEDZINA Board Member
ERIC WOLLER Board Member
JOE MEIDL Board Member
KATIE HEINTZ Board Member
ANNA BROWN Board Member
JOHN KIND Board Member
ANDREW WILLAERT Board Member
ANDREW MCNAMARA Board President
ANDREW WILLAERT Board President
THOMAS LENTZ Treasurer
MELINDA WEDZINA Secretary
ANN FREDRICKSON Board Member
ANNA BROWN Board Member
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board Member
JOE MEIDL Board Member
SARAH HOULE Board Member
KATIE HEINTZ Board Member
ERIC WOLLER Board Member
JOHN KIND Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 16.9% of Rev
SARAH HOULE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
BENJAMIN FINDLEY Board President
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board President
DAVID KNOPICK Treasurer
VIKTORIA DAVIS Secretary
ANDREW MCNAMARA Board Member
NATALIYA DANYLKOVA Board Member
JENNIFER FAUST Board Member
MARCIA JAGODZINSKE Board Member
JARED KOCH Board Member
JOHN MAXWELL Board Member
STEPHANIE THORPE Board Member
MELINDA WEDZINA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETHEL BALGE Executive Director 15.2% of Rev
SARAH HOULE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
BENJAMIN FINDLEY Board President
CHRISTOPHER PAUL Board President
DAVID KNOPICK Treasurer
VIKTORIA DAVIS Secretary
SHANNON BEAL Board President
NATALIYA DANYLKOVA Board Member
JENNIFER FAUST Board Member
MARCIA JAGODZINSKE Board Member
JARED KOCH Board Member
JOHN MAXWELL Board Member
STEPHANIE THORPE Board Member
MELINDA WEDZINA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points above the peer median (50 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.