Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — — 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — — 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 20.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 23.0% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 — — 18.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN GIBSON Treasurer —
AMANDA ZASTROW Secretary —
BRANDON JENKINS-MOAK Board President —
TOM COBURN Board Member —
JENNIE HENDRIE Board Member —
RICK KONG Board Member —
RANDY NORSTREM Board Member —
DOROTHY SCHEDVIN Board Member —
JERI WORKLAND Board Member —
KATHI VILLARUZ Board President —
BARB CIESLEK Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIE HENDRIE Board President —
BRANDON JENKINS-MOAK Board President —
JOHN GIBSON Treasurer —
KATHI VILLARUZ Board President —
AMANDA ZASTROW Secretary —
KATHI FERRARI Board Member —
BARB CIESLEK Board Member —
RICK KONG Board Member —
RANDY NORSTREM Board Member —
JERI WORKLAN Board Member —
TOM COBURN Board Member —
DOROTHY SCHEDVIN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL MURPHY Board Member —
KATHRYN MURPHY Board Member —
AMANDA ZASTROW Board Member —
ADELE DARR Board Member —
JENNIE HENDRIE Board President —
BRANDON JENKINS-MOAK Board President —
JOHN GIBSON Treasurer —
KATHI VILLARUZ Secretary —
KATHI FERRARI Board President —
LUANA JOSLIN-LESTER Board Member —
RICK KONG Board Member —
MARTIN MOORE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA ZASTROW Board Member —
JENNIE HENDRIE Board President —
BRANDON JENKINS-MOAK Board President —
JOHN GIBSON Treasurer —
KATHI VILLARUZ Secretary —
KATHI FERRARI Board President —
LUANA JOSLIN-LESTER Board Member —
RICK KONG Board Member —
MARTIN MOORE Board Member —
MICHAEL MORGAN Board Member —
KATHRYN MURPHY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (15 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.