Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
32
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 26.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tammy Scruggs-Duncan Executive Director 26.6% of Rev
David Wheeler Board President
Sandra Minter Board President
Steve Minter Treasurer
Kevin Cole Board Member
Mary Ann Beirne Board Member
Nancy Moga Board Member
Caleb Morrison Board Member
Linda Morrison Board Member
Beverly Johnson Board Member
Carl Withrow Board Member
Marian Paxton Board Member
Kimberly Halterman Board President
Mary Beth Garten Board Member
Katherine Doyle Board Member
Kayla Austin Board President
Carter Adcock House Manager
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (15 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.