Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 41 Fragile Recovery
2011 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Domenico Boyadjian Board Member 69.4% of Rev
Domenico Boyadjian Board Member 60.2% of Rev
Andrea Soncina General Manager 23.2% of Rev
Andrea Soncina General Manager 22.7% of Rev
Samantha Beam Board Member
Michelle Chan Board Member
Carl Greppin Board Member
Abbey Koehl Board Member
Greg Takacs Board President
Anne Hunter Board Member
Bonnie Svetlik Board Member
Amanda Centeck Board Member
Joy Slonaker Board President
Martin Layman Board President
Tanya Blue Secretary
Barbara Truitt Treasurer
Samantha Beam Board Member
Michelle Chan Board Member
Carl Greppin Board Member
Abbey Koehl Board Member
Joy Slonaker Board Member
Anne Hunter Board Member
Bonnie Svetlik Board Member
Amanda Centeck Board Member
Greg Takacs Board President
Martin Layman Board President
Tanya Blue Secretary
Barbara Truitt Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points below the peer median (5 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.