Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 11.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 13.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 19.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 9.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 13.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 15.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 14.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 14.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 10.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 21.8% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 9.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 14.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALYSSA K BREECE Executive Director 14.4% of Rev
ALYSSA K BREECE Executive Director 11.8% of Rev
PAIGE WINEBARGER Secretary
LAURA AMOS Board President
JAIME ANTHONY Board Member
ELWYN FRASER Board Member
JOHN HENRICH Board Member
JENA MENKE Board Member
NATHAN PETERSEN-KINDEM Board Member
KATE GRABER Treasurer
SARA BOYKIN Board Member
PAOLO DEBUQUE Board Member
CHERYL FRIEDRICHS Board Member
GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ Board Member
KATHY SALTZMAN ROMEY Board Member
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President
LAURA AMOS Board President
KATE GRABER Treasurer
PAIGE WINEBARGER Secretary
JAIME ANTHONY Board Member
ELWYN FRASER Board Member
JOHN HENRICH Board Member
NATHAN PETERSEN-KINDEM Board Member
GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ Board Member
BARBARA GREENE Board Member
DANIELLE J HILL Board Member
SHAWN SPOTT Board Member
ELIZABETH BARCHENGER Treasurer
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT A PESKIN Executive Director 13.2% of Rev
ELIZABETH BARCHENGER Treasurer
ERIC BREECE Board Member
KATE BIEDERWOLF REPRESENTATIVE
SCOTT CHAMBERLAIN Board Member
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President
ELIZABETH PAULY Board Member
PAIGE WINEBARGER Secretary
STEVE HUGHES Board Member
SUSAN TARNOWSKI Board Member
LAURA AMOS Board Member
JAIME ANTHONY Board Member
ELWYN FRASER JR Board Member
JOHN HENRICH Board Member
JENA MENKE Board Member
NATHAN PETERSEN-KINDEM Board Member
KATHY SALTZMAN ROMEY Board Member
ALYSSA BREECE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT A PESKIN Executive Director 10.7% of Rev
ELIZABETH BARCHENGER Treasurer
ERIC BREECE Board Member
KATE BIEDERWOLF Board Member
BRYAN MECHELL Secretary
SCOTT CHAMBERLAIN Board Member
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President
ELIZABETH PAULY Board Member
NOEL MARTINSON Board Member
BOB STOREYGARD Board Member
PAIGE WINEBARGER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 174 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (15 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.