Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 11.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — 13.3% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 19.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 9.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 13.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 15.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 14.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 14.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 14.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 10.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 21.8% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 9.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 14.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALYSSA K BREECE Executive Director 14.4% of Rev
ALYSSA K BREECE Executive Director 11.8% of Rev
PAIGE WINEBARGER Secretary —
LAURA AMOS Board President —
JAIME ANTHONY Board Member —
ELWYN FRASER Board Member —
JOHN HENRICH Board Member —
JENA MENKE Board Member —
NATHAN PETERSEN-KINDEM Board Member —
KATE GRABER Treasurer —
SARA BOYKIN Board Member —
PAOLO DEBUQUE Board Member —
CHERYL FRIEDRICHS Board Member —
GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
KATHY SALTZMAN ROMEY Board Member —
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President —
LAURA AMOS Board President —
KATE GRABER Treasurer —
PAIGE WINEBARGER Secretary —
JAIME ANTHONY Board Member —
ELWYN FRASER Board Member —
JOHN HENRICH Board Member —
NATHAN PETERSEN-KINDEM Board Member —
GUSTAVO RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
BARBARA GREENE Board Member —
DANIELLE J HILL Board Member —
SHAWN SPOTT Board Member —
ELIZABETH BARCHENGER Treasurer —
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT A PESKIN Executive Director 13.2% of Rev
ELIZABETH BARCHENGER Treasurer —
ERIC BREECE Board Member —
KATE BIEDERWOLF REPRESENTATIVE —
SCOTT CHAMBERLAIN Board Member —
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President —
ELIZABETH PAULY Board Member —
PAIGE WINEBARGER Secretary —
STEVE HUGHES Board Member —
SUSAN TARNOWSKI Board Member —
LAURA AMOS Board Member —
JAIME ANTHONY Board Member —
ELWYN FRASER JR Board Member —
JOHN HENRICH Board Member —
JENA MENKE Board Member —
NATHAN PETERSEN-KINDEM Board Member —
KATHY SALTZMAN ROMEY Board Member —
ALYSSA BREECE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT A PESKIN Executive Director 10.7% of Rev
ELIZABETH BARCHENGER Treasurer —
ERIC BREECE Board Member —
KATE BIEDERWOLF Board Member —
BRYAN MECHELL Secretary —
SCOTT CHAMBERLAIN Board Member —
MARIELLEN JACOBSON Board President —
ELIZABETH PAULY Board Member —
NOEL MARTINSON Board Member —
BOB STOREYGARD Board Member —
PAIGE WINEBARGER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (15 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.