Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
35
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
100
Score

Governance Advisory

📋 Compliance Status

State Annual Report
Status: OVERDUE
Overdue: 192 days

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 51 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 51 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 Hidden 55 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 Hidden 55 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 Hidden 49 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 Hidden 42 Fragile Recovery
2018 Hidden 38 Fragile Recovery
2017 Hidden Hidden 5.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 Hidden Hidden 10.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 Hidden Hidden 10.6% 38 Fragile Recovery
2014 Hidden Hidden 10.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 Hidden Hidden 11.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 Hidden Hidden 11.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 Hidden Hidden 14.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 Hidden Hidden 10.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2009 Hidden Hidden 10.6% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2008 Hidden Hidden 24.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Fine Treasurer 1.2% of Rev
Jacque Wharton Moreno Board President 0.5% of Rev
Wendy Rubin Board Member 0.5% of Rev
Baylee Brown Board President
Virginia Wilmerding Treasurer
Jeremiah Moreno Secretary
Judith Bennahum Board Member
Russell Janis Board Member
Julie Wray Board Member
Renee Butler-Lewis Board Member
Vince Haslam Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sara Bonnell Board President
Jenifer Kihm Board President
Renee Butler-Lewis Treasurer
Jeremiah Moreno Secretary
Shelly Hinds Armstrong Board Member
Judith Bennahum Board Member
Diana Clanin Board Member
Russell Janis Board Member
Julie Wray Board Member
Jacque Wharton Moreno Board Member
Virginia Wilmerding Executive Dir.

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHELLY HINDS ARMSTRONG Board Member
JUDITH BENNAHUM Board Member
DIANA CLANIN Board Member
RUSSELL JANIS Board Member
JULIE WRAY Board Member
VIRGINIA WILMERDING Executive Director
SARA BONNELL Board President
JENIFER KIHM Board President
RENEE BUTLER-LEWIS Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
35 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
100 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 68 points above the peer median (100 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.