Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 61 Stable Stable Watch
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 53.9% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 65 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stacy Braun Executive Director 28.3% of Rev
Erica Schaeffer Secretary 1.7% of Rev
Angela Huff Board President
David Eckert Board Member
Josh Phillips Board President
Dennis Mc Dermot Board Member
Angie Cleberg Treasurer
Wende Lewis Board Member
Victoria Georgoff Board President
Janet Hedges Board Member
Lucas Quail Board Member
Kathy Brumbaugh Board Member
Alexis Doerr Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 21 other orgs in SD with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points above the peer median (90 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 61 → 61 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.